Bloodborne HIV: Don't Get Stuck!

Protect yourself from bloodborne HIV during healthcare and cosmetic services

Depo-Provera: more HIV, weaker bones

[This is the first page on Depo-vs-HIV. Other pages in this section: document increasing Depo use in Africa; consider Depo vs. women’s rightscriticize the HIV-vs-death excuse for Depo; and two pages — before and after — criticize unethical research giving women Depo to see how many get HIV.] 

Evidence Depo-Provera increases women’s risk to get HIV by 40%-50%

Beginning in the mid-1990s, researchers recognized evidence that Depo-Provera injections (Depo) likely increased women’s risk to get HIV. More than a dozen studies over the next several decades recorded new HIV infections in women using or not using Depo.

During 2015-16, four research teams reviewed evidence from decades of research on women’s HIV risk with Depo. Here’s what they found:

  1. Ralph and co-authors, Lancet Infection Diseases 2015: Women using Depo were 40% more likely to get new HIV infections compared to women not using any hormonal contraception method. The study compiled evidence from 10 studies published during 2003-14.[1]

  2. Morrison and co-authors, PLoS Medicine 2015: Women using Depo were 50% more likely to get new HIV infections compared to women not using any hormonal contraception. The review compiled evidence from 18 studies (beginning 1993-2011) on a total of 37,124 women with a total of 1,830 new HIV infections.[2]

  3. Brind and co-authors, Issues in Law and Medicine 2015: Women using Depo (including in some cases some women using other steroid injections) were 49% more likely to get new HIV infections compared to women not using steroids for contraception (eg, no birth control, pills without steroids). The review included data from 16 papers published during 1994-2014.[3]

  4. Polis and co-authors, AIDS 2016: Women using Depo were 40% more likely to get new HIV infections compared to women not using hormonal contraception. The review includes data from 9 studies published during 2007-15.[4]

The active chemical in Depo – depo medroxyprogesterone acetate or DMPA – is similar to a natural hormone, progesterone. However, DMPA is not exactly the same. Specific differences between natural progesterone and DMPA may explain why Depo injections increase women’s risk to get HIV whereas some other injections for birth control (eg, NET EN) don’t seem to do so[5].

Depo weakens bones

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires anyone providing Depo in the United States to warn women that Depo use weakens their bones. This “black box” warning reads:[6]

                          WARNING: LOSS OF BONE MINERAL DENSITY

Women who use Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection may lose significant bone mineral density. Bone loss is greater with increasing duration of use and may not be completely reversible.

It is unknown if use of Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection during adolescence or early adulthood, a critical period of bone accretion, will reduce peak bone mass and increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture in later life.

Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection should not be used as a long-term birth control method (i.e., longer than 2 years) unless other birth control methods are considered inadequate.

Other side effects with Depo

Many women taking Depo have irregular bleeding, weight gain (reported average weight gain of >6 kg in 4 years), and other problems. It has also been linked to an increase in some cancers.[6] If a woman is already HIV-positive, Depo use seems to increase HIV transmission to their sex partners.


1. Ralph LR, McCoy SI, Shiu K, Padian N. Hormonal contraception use and women’s risk of HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2015; 15: 181-89. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2018).

2. Morrison CS. Chen P-L. Kwok C, et al. Hormonal contraception and the risk of HIV acquisition: an individual participant meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 2015. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2018).

3. Brind J, Condly SJ, Mosher SW, et al. Risk of HIV infection in depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issues in Law and Medicine 2015; 30: 129-138. Abstract available at: (accessed 5 March 2018). More results from this review are at: Depo-Provera and HIV. PRI, no date. Available at: (accessed 6 March 2018).

4. Polis CB, Curtis KM, Hannaford PC, et al. An updated systematic review of epidemiological evidence on hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition in women. AIDS 2016; 30: 2665-2683. Available at: (accessed 5 March 2018).

5. Hapgood JP, Kaushic C. Hel Z. Hormonal contraception and HIV-1 acquisition: biological mechanisms. Available at: (accessed 4 March 2018).

5. FDA. Full prescribing information [for Depo-Provera]. No date. Available at: (accessed 7 March 2018).

4 responses to “Depo-Provera: more HIV, weaker bones

  1. Pingback: Respecting women’s human rights by telling them about all their HIV risks « Don't Get Stuck With HIV

  2. Pingback: Time to Try Again with Female Condoms | Blogtivist

  3. Pingback: Infinite Regress of Expert Opinion On the Behavioral Myth of HIV in Africa | Don't Get Stuck With HIV

  4. Pingback: GlaxoSmithKline: “How Modern Clinical Trials are Carried Out” | Don't Get Stuck With HIV

Leave a Reply (Please feel free to do so anonymously)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: